Wahhábi dalam Perspektif HUDA dan Implikasinya terhadap Kehidupan Sosial Keagamaan di Aceh

Authors

  • Khairil Miswar Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22373/tadabbur.v2i1.57

Keywords:

HUDA;, dayah;, ulema;, perspective;, Wahhabism;, Aswaja

Abstract

The HUDA, Himpunan Ulama Dayah Aceh (Association of Aceh Traditional Islamic Scholars) has generally viewed the Wahhabism as a heretical group. However, in practice the HUDA ulemas (Islamic scholars) have a different assessment on Wahhabi-developed teachings, either in theology or in fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence). This study examined the perceptions of the HUDA on Wahhabism and their implications for socio-religious life in Aceh. This was a qualitative study, combining library research and field research. The approach used was the sociological-phenomenological approach. Data were collected by interview and literature survey. Findings indicated that, in terms of theology, the HUDA perceived the Wahhabi movement asdeviant and heretical. In the case of fiqh, however, the Wahhabism has not followed any madhhabs (schools of thought) or mixed them. While in the socio-religious life, the Wahhabis often accused others of practicing bid‘ah (heresy) and shirk (polytheism). There were also some HUDA ulemas who considered Muhammadiyah part of the Wahhabism. The HUDA also believed that LIPIA, As-Sunnah Islamic boarding school, and Imam Shafi‘i boarding school were some educational institutions involved in spreading Wahhabism in Aceh. As Wahhabism has spread throughout Aceh, there have been resistance movements by the dayah ulema, leading to trigger people’s social movements. The study concluded that the HUDA has developed a negative perception towards the Wahhabism. As a consequence, the perception has caused hatred to arise within the community towards the Wahhabism. This also resulted in the emergence of dayah ulema’s resistance and refusal movements to the Wahhabism in Aceh.

References

A.K, Baihaqi. Ulama dan Madrasah Aceh, dalam Taufik Abdullah, Agama dan Perubahan Sosial. Jakarta: Rajawali, 1983.

Ahmad, Kamaruzzaman Bustamam. Memahami Potensi Radikalisme dan Terorisme di Aceh. Banda Aceh: Bandar Publishing, 2016.

Amin, Husayn Ahmad. Seratus Tokoh dalam Sejarah Islam. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2006.

Amin, M. & Abdullah dkk. Antologi Studi Islam Teori dan Metodologi. Yogyakarta: Sunan Kalijaga Press, 2000.

Armstrong, Karen. Berperang Demi Tuhan: Fundamentalisme dalam Islam, Kristen dan Yahudi. terj. T. Hermaya. Bandung: Mizan, 2001.

Asmuni, H.M. Yusran. Dirasah Islamiyah: Pengantar Studi Pemikiran dan Gerakan Pembaruan dalam Dunia Islam Jilid III, cet. 2. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1998.

Asy-Syuwa’ir, Muhammad bin Sa’ad. Sebenarnya Siapakah Wahhẚbi itu?, terj. Umar Prasetyo. Bandung: Toobagus Publishing, 2012.

Atjeh, Aboebakar. Ahlus Sunnah Wal Djama’ah Kejakinan dan I’tiqad. Djakarta: Jajasan Baitul Mal, 1969.

______________. Ilmu Ketuhanan (Ilmu Kalam), Djakarta: Tintamas, 1966.

______________. Salaf Muhji Atsaris Salaf; Gerakan Salafijah di Indonesia. Djakarta: Permata, 1970.

Aziz Masyhuri, Abdul. Siapa Wahhẚbi, dalam Muhammad Fakih bin Abdul Jabbar Maskumbang, Menolak Wahhẚbi Membongkar Penyimpangan Sekte Wahhẚbi; dari Ibn Taimiyah hingga Abdul Qadir At-Tilmisani, terj. Abdul Aziz Masyhuri. Depok: Sahifa, 2015.

Dobbin, Christine. Gejolak Ekonomi Kebangkitan Islam dan Gerakan Paderi, terj. Lilian D. Tedjasudhana. Depok: Komunitas Bambu, 2008.

Gibb, H.A.R. Islam dalam Lintasan Sedjarah, terj. Abu Salamah, cet. 2. Djakarta: Bhratara, 1964.

Haryanto, Sindung. Sosiologi Agama dari Klasik Hingga Postmodern. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2016.

Hitti, Philip. K. History of The Arabs, terj. R. Cecep Lukman Yasin dan Dedi Slamet Riyadi. Jakarta: Serambi Ilmu Semesta, 2013.

Huntington, Samuel P. Benturan Antar Peradaban dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia, cet. 12, terj. M. Sadat Ismail. Jakarta: Qalam, 2012.

Kahmad, Dadang. Metode Peneltian Agama Perspektif Ilmu Perbandingan Agama. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2011.

Kamali, M. Hasyim. Membumikan Sharỉ‘ah, terj. Miki Salman. Jakarta: Noura Books, 2013.

Klandermans, Bert. Protes dalam Kajian Psikologi Sosial, terj. Helly P. Soetjipto. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2005.

Mannheim, Karl. Sosiologi Sistematis, terj. Alimandan. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1986.

Martins, Richard C. Approaches to Islam in Religious Studies. Arizona State University, 1985.

Piscatori, James P. Peranan Islam dalam Pembangunan Politik Saudi Arabiya, dalam John L. Esposito (Ed), Islam dan Perubahan Sosial Politik di Negara sedang Berkembang, terj. Wardah Hafidz, Yogyakarta: PLP2M, 1985.

Sagiv, David. Islam Otensitas Liberalisme, terj. Yudian W. Asmin, Yogyakarta: LKiS, 1997.

Schimmel, Annemarie. Deciphering The Signs of God; A Phenomenological Approach to Islam. State University of New York Press, 1994.

Viors, Milton. In the Shadow of the Prophet: The Struggle for the Soul of Islam. New York, Doubleday, 1998.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-01

How to Cite

Miswar, K. (2020). Wahhábi dalam Perspektif HUDA dan Implikasinya terhadap Kehidupan Sosial Keagamaan di Aceh. adabbur: urnal eradaban slam, 2(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.22373/tadabbur.v2i1.57