Percobaan Pembunuhan Sebagai Mawani‘ Al-Irth dalam KHI Pasal 173 Dilihat Menurut Perspektif Maqașid Al-Syari‘Ah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/tadabbur.v1i2.26Keywords:
Trial of Assassination;, Mawani' Al-Irth;, Maqașid al-Syari‘ahAbstract
Trial of Assassination is an action carried out with the intention of killing people, but the person who wants to be killed does not die. In KHI Article 173 stated that the trial of assassination were prevented from inheriting, but in fiqh did not mention this, because that was the result of ijtihad by Indonesian Islamic law experts. Based on this, this research attempted to explain the provisions of the KHI regarding the trial of assassination as mawani' al-irth, and the provisions of KHI regarding the trial of assasination as mawani‘ al-irth seen in the motivations behind it. Both of these will be studied using the perspective of maqașid al-syari'ah. The type of research used in this thesis is library research (qualitative research). Sources of data from this study come from the book al-Muwafaqat, Tasyri 'al-Jinaai al-Islami, Al-Fatawa al-Fiqhiyyah al-Kubra, Al-Tahzib fi Fiqh Imam Al-Syafi'i and the book Compilation of Islamic Law by Cik Hasan Bisri, as well as books and journals relating to maqașid al-syari'ah and mawani' al-irth. Data collection method is carried out in documentation and data analysis method in the form of qualitative descriptive. The results of the study indicate that the provisions of the KHI Article 173 concerning trial of assassination that’s hindered from inheriting is not suitable to be applied. Because the trial of assassination does not cause a person to die. Then in KHI also do not recognize the term forgiveness, even though the opportunity to be forgiven by the own heir is very large. Furthermore, in KHI, it does not consider the background of doing this action, even though between one person and another person has different intentions and objectives. Although the trial of assassination is a case that violates the existence of maqașid al-syari‘ah from the needs of the dharuriyyah, which is guarding the soul (hifz al-nafs), the benefit here is to apply a law according to the conditions that it wants. Because the basic purpose of Islamic law (maqașid al-syari‘ah) is to gain benefit and prevent damage (mafsadah).
References
Abd al-Qadir Audah, Tasyri’ al-Jinaai al-Islami Muqaranan Bilqanuuni al-Wadh’i, juz I, Beirut: Darul Kaatibu al-A’rabi, b.s.
Abdul Wahhab Khallaf, Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Islam (Ilmu Ushul Fiqh), Terj. Noer Iskandar Al-Barsany dan M. Tolchah Mansoer, cet. 6, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo, 1996.
Abu Ishak al-Syatibi, al-Muwafaqat fi Ushul al-Syari’ah, Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifah, 1975.
Ahda Fithriani, “Penghalang Kewarisan Dalam Pasal 173 Huruf (a) Kompilasi Hukum Islam”, Syariah Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, No. 2 (Desember 2015).
Akhmad Khisni, “Percobaan Pembunuhan Sebagai Penghalang Hak Waris Perspektif Hukum Islam dan KHI,” Jurnal Pembahariuan Hukum III No. 2, (Mei-Agustus 2016).
Alaiddin Koto, Filsafat Hukum Islam, cet I, Jakarta: Rajawali pers, 2012.
Al-Baghawi, Al-Tahzib fi Fiqh Imam Al-Syafi’i, Juz. VII, Beirut: Dar Kitab al-‘Ilmiah, b.s.
Amir Syarifuddin, Ushul Fiqh, jil. I, cet. I, Jakarta: Logos Wacana Ilmu, 1997.
Amru Syahputra Lubis, “Pandangan Ulama Kota Medan Terhadap Penghalang Mendapatkan Warisan dalam KHI Pasal 173” Thesis yang dipublikasikan di cache repository. uinsu.ac.id/1465/1/tesis%20 Lubis%28 syahputra%29.pdf, UIN Sumatra Utara, 2014, diakses tanggal 22 Januari 2018.
Cik Hasan Bisri, Muhammad Daud Ali, Roihan A. Rasyid dkk, Kompilasi Hukum Islam dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional, cet. I, Jakarta: Logos Wacana Ilmu, 1999.
Djam’an Satori, Metodologi Penelitan Kualitatif, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012.
Djazuli, Kaidah-Kaidah Fiqh, cet. II, Jakarta: Kencana, 2007.
Fauzan, “Percobaan Pembunuhan Sebagai Penghalang Kewarisan,” Al-Hurriyah II, No. I (Januari-Juni 2010)
Firdaus, Ushul Fiqh (Metode Mengkaji dan Memahami Hukum Islam Secara Komprehensif), Jakarta Timur: Zikrul Media Intelektual, 2004.
Hasbi Ash-shiddiqy, Bustami A. Gani, Muchtar Jahya dkk, Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahnya, (Madinah: Komplek Percetakan al-Qur’anul karim kepunyaan Raja Fahd (Mujammā’ al-Malik Fahd Li Thiba’āt al-Mushḫaf asy-Syarīf), 1971.
Ibn Majah, Sunan Ibn Majah, juz II, Dar Ihya al-Kitab al-‘Arabiyah, b.s.
Ibnu Hajar Al-Haitami, Al-Fatawa al-Fiqhiyyah al-Kubra, juz. I, Maktabah Al-Islamiah, b.s.
Juhra, Siti Wasilah, and Moch. Fajarul Falah. “Taṭwir Kitab Al-Qirā’ah Al-Rasyīdah Bi Al-Șuwar.” DAYAH: Journal of Islamic Education, 2018. https://doi.org/10.22373/jie.v1i1.2486.
Komite Fakultas Syari’ah Universitas Al-Azhar Mesir, Hukum Waris, terj. Addys Aldizar dan Fathurrahman, Jakarta Selatan: Senayan Abadi Publishing, 2004.
Maysah, Mayumi, and Mukhlisah Mukhlisah. “Taṭwir Kitab Khulāșah Nūr Al-Yaqīn Bi Al-Șuwar Al-Bayāniyah.” DAYAH: Journal of Islamic Education 1, no. 1 (2018): 27. https://doi.org/10.22373/jie.v1i1.2487.
Mukhtar Yahya dan Fatchur Rahman, Dasar-dasar Pembinaan Fiqh Islam, cet. V, Bandung: Alma’arif, 1986.
Muslim, Shahih Muslim, juz I, Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turats al-‘Arabi, b.s.
………, Shahih Muslim, juz VI, Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-‘Arabi, b.s.
Nasrullah Yahya, Sosiologi Hukum Islam, cet. I, Lhokseumawe: Sefa Bumi Persada, 2013.
R. Soesilo, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal, Bogor: Politeia, 1991.
Rakhmat Nur Hakim, “KH Ma’ruf Amin: Indonesia Bukan Negara Islam Tetapi Negara Kesepakatan,” Kompas, 10 Oktober 2017.
Sutrisno Hadi, Metodologi Research Jilid I,Yogyakarta: Andi Offset, 1993.
